Men with more talent or ability tend to possess more land than those who were less gifted. It is in vain to say that enlightened statesmen will be able to adjust these clashing interests, and render them all subservient to the public good.
Later in his study, Beard repeated his point, only providing more emphasis. So strong is this propensity of mankind to fall into mutual animosities, that where no substantial occasion presents itself, the most frivolous and fanciful distinctions have been sufficient to kindle their unfriendly passions and excite their most violent conflicts.
It is worthy of remark that not only the first, but every succeeding Congress, as well as the late convention, have invariably joined with the people in thinking that the prosperity of America depended on its Union.
I am persuaded in my own mind that the people have always thought right on this subject, and that their universal and uniform attachment to the cause of the Union rests on great Essay number 10 of the federalist weighty reasons, which I shall endeavor to develop and explain in some ensuing papers.
Some Men are members of particularly large factions who have prejudices or evil motives, and could influence the people of the United States through intrigue or corruption.
Hamilton there addressed the destructive role of a faction in breaking apart the republic. Subsequently, there are many different kinds of property. In the next place, as each representative will be chosen by a greater number of citizens in the large than in the small republic, it will be more difficult for unworthy candidates to practice with success the vicious arts by which elections are too often carried; and the suffrages of the people being more free, will be more likely to centre in men who possess the most attractive merit and the most diffusive and established characters.
With what propriety, therefore, or for what good purposes, are attempts at this particular period made by some men to depreciate the importance of the Union? The republican form of government works to prevent factions because a higher number of representatives guard against the attempts of the few, and because the extended sphere of the republic makes it less probably that a faction will become a majority of the whole.
Providence has in a particular manner blessed it with a variety of soils and productions, and watered it with innumerable streams, for the delight and accommodation of its inhabitants.
When a majority is included in a faction, the form of popular government, on the other hand, enables it to sacrifice to its ruling passion or interest both the public good and the rights of other citizens. Madison believed that the problem was not with the Articles, but rather the state legislatures, and so the solution was not to fix the articles but to restrain the excesses of the states.
Landowners will become the most burdened class in society. After all, Americans fought for it during the American Revolution. It may clog the administration, it may convulse the society; but it will be unable to execute and mask its violence under the forms of the Constitution.
The smaller the society, the fewer probably will be the distinct parties and interests composing it; the fewer the distinct parties and interests, the more frequently will a majority be found of the same party; and the smaller the number of individuals composing a majority, and the smaller the compass within which they are placed, the more easily will they concert and execute their plans of oppression.
Those who are creditors, and those who are debtors, fall under a like discrimination. On the other hand, the effect may be inverted. In the extent and proper structure of the Union, therefore, we behold a republican remedy for the diseases most incident to republican government.
The friend of popular governments never finds himself so much alarmed for their character and fate, as when he contemplates their propensity to this dangerous vice.
They formed it almost as soon as they had a political existence; nay, at a time when their habitations were in flames, when many of their citizens were bleeding, and when the progress of hostility and desolation left little room for those calm and mature inquiries and reflections which must ever precede the formation of a wise and wellbalanced government for a free people.
On the theoretical side, they leaned heavily on the work of Charles de Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu. Even if there is a majority, it would be harder for them to work together because of the large number of people and the fact they are spread out in a wider territory.
This country and this people seem to have been made for each other, and it appears as if it was the design of Providence, that an inheritance so proper and convenient for a band of brethren, united to each other by the strongest ties, should never be split into a number of unsocial, jealous, and alien sovereignties.
There are two methods of curing the mischiefs of faction:The Federalist Papers: No.
10 Previous Document: Contents: Next Document: The Same Subject Continued The Union as a Safeguard Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection in order to guard against the confusion of a multitude.
Hence, the number of representatives in the two cases not being in proportion to that of the two constituents. In essay number 10 of The Federalist, James Madison maintained that the constitutional government would prevent any one faction from subverting the freedom of other groups. The core of Antifederalists' opposition to the Constitution centered on.
A summary of Federalist Essays No - No in The Founding Fathers's The Federalist Papers (). Learn exactly what happened in this chapter, scene, or section of The Federalist Papers () and what it means. Perfect for acing essays, tests, and quizzes, as well as for writing lesson plans.
10 is an essay written by James Madison as the tenth of The Federalist Papers: Though this number of reprintings was typical for The Federalist essays, many other essays, both Federalist and Anti-Federalist, saw much wider billsimas.com: James Madison. This, as he stated in Federalist 10, would provide a "republican remedy for the diseases most incident to republican government." It is also interesting to note that James Madison was the most creative and philosophical disciple of the Scottish school of science and politics in the Philadelphia Convention.
Federalist Papers #10 Essay Words | 6 Pages United we stand, divided we fall The Federalist Papers Number 10 is written by James Madison and explains the necessity of the Constitution to protect our country from factions.Download