First it has attracted the attention of scholars from disparate disciplines who had hitherto shown little interest in learning processes. Given the overwhelmingly positive stereotypes at least in popular culture and especially with fictional characters often associated with eccentricity, as detailed above, certain individuals seek to be associated with this sort of character type.
There must be public representations of organizational theory-in-use to which individuals can refer. Eccentrics may or may not comprehend the standards for normal behavior in their culture.
There is helpful material on experiential learning and The characteristics of the positive learning environment learning plus updates on the literature. What is organizational learning?
The latter takes us into the arena of competing learning theories — ideas about how we might gain understandings. We explore the idea that organizations may be a constellation of communities of practice.
Traditionally, the study of cognitive processes, cognitive development, and the cultivation of educationally desirable skills and competencies has treated everything cognitive as being possessed and residing in the heads of individuals; social, cultural, and technological factors have been relegated to the role of backdrops or external sources of stimulation Salomon The social perspective on organization learning focuses on the way people make sense of their experiences at work.
There are those who argue that it is individuals, not organizations, who learn. It will tend to be: Lave and Wenger and Wenger provide a fascinating example of the social perspective in action in their studies of apprenticeship and communities of practice.
We will also look at the notions of experiential learning and informal learning. Eccentric first appeared in English essays as a neologism in as an astronomical term meaning "a circle in which the earth, sun, etc.
The skin becomes a boundary — everything that happens outside the wall it forms becomes the other — the world outside; what is inside is me — the world inside.
Some eccentrics are pejoratively considered " cranks " rather than geniuses. Two developments have been highly significant in the growth of the field.
If organizations can learn, this does not mean that they learn very well. Theory, method and practice, Reading, Mass: Inthe definition evolved from the literal to the figurative, and eccentric is noted to have begun being used to describe unconventional or odd behavior.
The picture is always incomplete — and people, thus, are continually working to add pieces and to get a view of the whole. In order to start thinking about learning we need to make the simple distinction between learning as a product and as a process.
The second development is that many consultants and companies have caught onto the commercial significance of organizational learning… Much of the effort of these theorists has been devoted to identifying templates, or ideal forms, which real organizations could attempt to emulate.
Is it a process or a product? Feedback about the results of organizational actions may be distorted or suppressed as people rush to protect their turf or to maintain a positive climate…. A theory of action perspective, Reading, Mass: The learning of the collective suffers from a startling range of limitations… Some of these are equally characteristic of solo and collective learning entities.
These are the shared descriptions of the organization which individuals jointly construct and use to guide their own inquiry…. This information may be quantitative or qualitative, but is generally explicit and in the public domain….
Organizations are approached as constellations of communties of practice. In this way of coming to understand our selves the body plays a crucial role.
We have structured this page around three basic questions: It is not so much that learners acquire structures or models to understand the world, but they participate in frameworks that that have structure.Eccentricity (also called quirkiness) is unusual or odd behavior on the part of an individual.
This behavior would typically be perceived as unusual or unnecessary, without being demonstrably billsimas.comricity is contrasted with normal behavior, the nearly universal means by which individuals in society solve given problems and pursue certain priorities in everyday life. Learning in organizations.
In recent years there has been a lot of talk of ‘organizational learning’. Here we explore the theory and practice of such learning via pages in the encyclopaedia of informal education.Download